Willow Ventures

Google and Amazon’s Israeli cloud contracts reportedly require them to sidestep legal orders | Insights by Willow Ventures

Google and Amazon's Israeli cloud contracts reportedly require them to sidestep legal orders | Insights by Willow Ventures

Google’s and Amazon’s Alleged “Winking Mechanism” in Israeli Data Contracts

Recent reports reveal a controversial mechanism involving Google and Amazon in relation to their contracts with Israel. This alleged “winking mechanism” raises significant questions about data privacy and compliance with international law.

What is the “Winking Mechanism”?

According to a report from The Guardian, a provision in the 2021 Project Nimbus cloud computing contract mandates that Google and Amazon send coded financial messages to Israel when complying with overseas requests for data. This system is said to involve dollar amounts that correspond to the country of origin for the data request.

How Does the Coding System Work?

The coded payments reportedly use international dialing codes as a reference. For example:

  • If Google or Amazon hands over Israeli data to the U.S. (dialing code +1), they would remit 1,000 shekels.
  • For Italy (code +39), the payment would be 3,900 shekels.

An additional failsafe mechanism allows companies to inform Israel by sending 100,000 shekels if a gag order hinders them from using the standard signaling method.

Reactions from the Companies Involved

Amazon has publicly denied any misleading practices, emphasizing customer privacy. An Amazon spokesperson stated, “We respect the privacy of our customers… and we maintain confidentiality in accordance with applicable laws.”

On the other hand, Google labeled the accusations as unfounded and claimed, “The idea that we would evade our legal obligations… is categorically wrong.” They stressed the clarity of the Nimbus contract and their adherence to legal standards.

Microsoft’s Position

Microsoft, which competed for the Nimbus contract, reportedly lost to Google and Amazon due to its refusal to accept some terms set forth by Israel. This outcome raises questions about competitive practices and international negotiations.

Conclusion

The allegations surrounding Google’s and Amazon’s operations in Israel shine a light on critical issues related to privacy and governance in tech. As the story unfolds, further scrutiny is anticipated on the implications for data handling and international law.


Related Keywords: Google, Amazon, Project Nimbus, Israeli data privacy, international law, cloud computing contracts, corporate compliance.


Source link